Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Van Cuylenberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –MuZemike 23:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Mark Van Cuylenberg

 * – ( View AfD View log )

He exists, but I can't find sufficient RS coverage (more than trivial). Tagged for notability since this past June. Epeefleche (talk) 23:11, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment. Some sources use a different spelling: . Phil Bridger (talk) 15:51, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. Only reference that makes a incidental quotation. Does every person that is quoted in the news need an article? -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 00:00, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.