Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Williams Van Proyen Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:32, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Mark Williams Van Proyen Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable record label; fails WP:GNG. Only stuff I can find online are just mirrors of this article. Bonkers The Clown (Nonsensical Babble)  12:54, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. No coverage found in reliable sources for this label; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP.  Gongshow  Talk 17:58, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  02:13, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:10, 27 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Nothing to support the information or establish notability aside from claims from their alleged clients and Google News and Books found nothing relevant. Benefit of the doubt, this may be a very small record label and it seems there isn't an existing official website or anything related (social media profiles, etc.). SwisterTwister   talk  06:14, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.