Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Worthington (journalist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:47, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Mark Worthington (journalist)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Can't find enough in-depth sourcing to show that he meets WP:GNG. Lots of mentions.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:11, 7 January 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Can't soft-delete due to this, so relisting. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:32, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 14:24, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Singapore. AllyD (talk) 18:35, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Existing sources do not show any evidence of significant and independent coverage, and I could not find anything better. Jfire (talk) 02:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Distinguishing the phases of the subject's career: (1) As a working BBC journalist he reported on various stories of the day, but notability is not inherited, nor is one report's nomination for an award notable in itself; (2) As a Bell Pottinger Asia executive, there is no clear notability; (3) His involvement in buyout/rebrand of Klareco Communications does not appear distinctly notable; (4) Nor does he appear specifically notable as an occasional media guest commentator on business events. Overall I am not seeing evidence of specific notability here. AllyD (talk) 08:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.