Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Young, polymath


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:57, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Mark Young, polymath

 * – ( View AfD View log )

non notable person, but does make a claim to notability so fails a7. only one RS, which does not reference the subject. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:31, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete So far, the references presented do not satisfy WP:BIO. Edison (talk) 02:53, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No apparent coverage of note. Maybe Merge to Mark Young, egomaniac. EEng (talk) 06:04, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * comment this looks to be fairly one sided already, but just as additional comment - Mark Young teaches at aberdeen university, and the creator's name is aberdeentartan. Perhaps a COI (or even autobiography). Gaijin42 (talk) 18:21, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yes, it has all the hallmarks of WP:VANITY.  But what it does assert is sufficient notability. --Legis (talk - contribs) 00:45, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, not a notable person. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I would favor deletion -- as it is spam. Bearian (talk) 00:07, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.