Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark ivey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Mark ivey
Discussion to run until at least 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This elected official, from a Texas county, does not meet WP:POLITICIAN standards. And a Google search does not confirm "Porkchop" as his nickname. Pastor Theo (talk) 01:47, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of notability, lack of content and as a possible subtle attack. PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for notabilityCamera123456 (talk) 03:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete for failing WP:N. ArcAngel (talk) 17:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete border line attack page, not notable doktorb wordsdeeds 19:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, seems like a subtle attack page to me too. Cazort (talk) 21:41, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete (G10) as childish name-calling of an elected official. Poopy-heads! MuZemike 23:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * '''Delete - not notable. Kittybrewster  &#9742;  00:12, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.