Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markell casey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW delete. It's obvious where this is going, no need to sit through the formalities. r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 19:35, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Markell casey

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Another editor thinks the article makes a claim of notability. I don't see it. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 16:09, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm the editor who declined the speedy, because I thought the "company" he claimed to have started was enough claim of notability to send this to AfD (but not enough notability for it to pass an AfD). Now that I look more closely, the only references to that company are on his own myspace page, so it probably actually is speedy-able.  Now that this is stared, though, I'll wait and see; if it starts SNOWing I'll speedy it. r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 16:24, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as this article does not show notability. A google search shows the subject is only mentioned on Facebook, Myspace, and in one video on Youtube. Also, reads promotionally with weasel words like "He is highly regarded as a talented musician with a lot of potential and a bright future ahead of him." and "Many people that have worked with him have been astounded by his knowledge of music for someone so young." And those are only in the first paragraph. Mm40 (talk) 16:26, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails to meet WP:N and reeks of WP:VSCA. Eddie.willers (talk) 18:20, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.