Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Market abuse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The nominator has withdrawn but this discussion has been open long enough and has enough participation for a "keep" close. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:54, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Market abuse

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Nothing more than a definition, with an odd template attached. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:15, 6 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: Well it is currently just a stub and you are just describing what it is now, not what it potentially could be after expansion. It looks to be a common phrase on google.--Penbat (talk) 09:55, 6 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep A widely used legal and regulatory concept, especially in Europe. Here's a book: The mechanics and regulation of market abuse: A legal and economic analysis, by E. E. Avgouleas, 2005, Wiley.  Improve this stub on a notable topic through normal editing.  Don't delete it. Cullen328 (talk) 16:16, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep When I have spare time, I will write on it. In Europe the subject is well identified since the Market Abuse Directive enacted by the European Union has been transposed into national laws. Bmathis (talk) 18:59, 7 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Withdraw nomination. I see where this is going. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:49, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.