Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Market entry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 02:28, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Market entry

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is original research by the author of one of the cited references, who is also the creator of the article. It may be fixable if rewritten. Guy (Help!) 20:30, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The subject matter appears to be the topic of multiple non fiction books. Author should be notified of WP:COI and WP:OR rules, and I'm going to fix all those links to be wikilinks now. -- i kan reed (talk) 22:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Follow up Alright, I've done some wikification. Doesn't look quite so horrifying right now.  I'll add it to my watch list and do some serious sourcing and clean up if I ever have time(and it isn't deleted). i kan reed (talk) 22:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Cool. Can you find a better source than quickmba.com?  That looks like spam masquerading as a source. Guy (Help!) 10:39, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Sounds reasonable. I'll go look. i kan reed (talk) 18:37, 17 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Plenty notable. would be nice to have a better sourcing. Decoratrix (talk) 23:24, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. A definitely notable subject, and Ikanreed has volunteered to clean up. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:32, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep clearly notable.Balloonman (talk) 07:56, 18 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.