Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marketing 2.0


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article is an essay and original research. Davewild (talk) 16:23, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Marketing 2.0

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Essay, neologism, no peer-reviewed sources. Tons of blog hits on Google, but obviously those are of no use. --- RockMFR 14:48, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unverifiable essay. WillOakland (talk) 19:00, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - OR essay or perhaps just a copyvio. Jfire (talk) 19:20, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Appears essay-like now, but the term is indeed popular among the business crowd online. Gary King ( talk )  19:17, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Essentially unsourced, since linked pages don't define term, and therefore original research. Minos P. Dautrieve (talk) 15:17, 26 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.