Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marketing Cowardice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:37, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Marketing Cowardice

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article is about a recently coined term used by a news columnist. There is no evidence for any wide spread usage of the term or coverage of the concept. Whpq (talk) 21:28, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Evidently republished all over the place, so a Weak Delete. Andewz111 (typo intended) 21:36, 19 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Neologism. Syndication does not count as multiple sources. The article can always be recreated if this gains wider currency. Delete. -- The Anome (talk) 08:38, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ℳøℕø 00:58, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. A non-notable neologism that really tells us nothing, just a fuzz of glittering generalities: a fearful state of existence that prevents creativity, risk and individuality. It infects the actions of marketers and it is directly responsible for stale communications, easily forgettable campaigns, products, services or ideas. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:22, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Smerdis, I felt part of my soul die as I read it. -- Nuujinn (talk) 00:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. This is just promotion for, or a reiteration of, a single newspaper column. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:34, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.