Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markham Ward 3 by-election, 2009


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unclear why a 2009 election should redirect to a 2006 election?  Sandstein  19:34, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Markham Ward 3 by-election, 2009

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Article, sourced entirely to primary source content on the city's own website with no reliable source coverage shown at all, about a one-off special election in one city council ward in a city where city councillors do not get an WP:NPOL pass just for being city councillors (and even in the rare global cities where city councillors do get that pass, we still don't create standalone articles about individual ward by-elections.) There's simply nothing here to suggest any sustained encyclopedic interest -- the article simply amounts to "this happened, here's the vote totals, the end", with no context for why an encyclopedia should care. Bearcat (talk) 17:42, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:44, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:49, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:49, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - the proposer sums it up perfectly. Shritwod (talk) 14:13, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Markham municipal election, 2006. Not much needs to be transferred, IMO - just the reason for the by-election and the vote results should be sufficient.   PK  T (alk)  19:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.