Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markland Medieval Mercenary Militia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 04:25, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Markland Medieval Mercenary Militia

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I feel that although on the fact of it this should meet the notability criteria, I don't think it quite meets the criteria. The coverage (although in multiple sources) appear to be individually minor, with a few bits of information about the organisation rather than the indepth coverage we normally look for. However, I feel that this deletion would be potentially controversial, hence bring to AfD rather than PRODing it.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 18:54, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Enough coverage in sufficiently numerous RS to attain significance when considered in its totality. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 19:27, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Leaning towards Delete since the coverage seems sparse eg The National Public Radio piece is about the Vikings not about the Militia itself. On a side note, there seems to be notability concerns about Regia Anglorum the British group of Anglo-Saxon/early medieval re-enactment organisation (its been prodded) GraemeLeggett (talk) 19:45, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Covered in numerous sources. Warden (talk) 00:03, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete promotional article, and rather borderline sourcing.  DGG ( talk ) 03:43, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete the sources look trivial at best for the most part. It looks like there is only twoish good sources --Guerillero &#124; My Talk  00:43, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.