Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marko Živić Show


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Courcelles (talk) 06:20, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Marko Živić Show

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable. It seems to be a lot of fodder about a failed local TV project. The "references" are all local tabloids. Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 22:58, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. For "local" above read "national", and this "failed" project aired for 95 episodes on a national terrestrial network. These intra-Balkan nominations are getting very tiresome - even if you don't like your neighbours can't you simply accept that we can still have articles about them? Phil Bridger (talk) 23:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Dude, seriously, try to assume good faith. This is not non-notable to me personally, in fact it is somewhat notable to me personally because it is from a neighboring country, but it's not notable to the rest of the world. For reference, I have also recently submitted several random local "celebs" from my country for deletion, in addition to other things. Do try to remember that just because you may think we're all some sort of tribal grudge-holders, not all of us actually are that :P --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 11:53, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * JFTR I have only nominated the dead projects, and not Fajront Republika, because that is the current one that seems to have outlasted these other two and may actually have a future. You know, what with all the "notability is not temporary" policy :P --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk)
 * Also on the matter of national terrestrial TV network production - it is not inherently notable. You could probably find numerous ad campaigns with longer relative and absolute air-time, as well as larger coverage, but it would still not be necessarily notable. Indeed I believe all commercial media programmes need to be scrutinized under the anti-publicity guidelines, because often the point of their existence, and the resulting media coverage, is in fact generating an endless stream of publicity that is circularly referenced. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 12:29, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:35, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:36, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep There are certainly some notability issues, but everything else seems to be in good order (Links to hosts etc etc). Just doubling my comment from Articles for deletion/Oralno doba Dengero (talk) 16:34, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Program aired nationally for 95 episodes. More sources should be included, but several already are. Firsfron of Ronchester  02:33, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * It's becoming pointless to paste analogous comments from Articles for deletion/Oralno doba, anyone interested please see over there :) --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 08:26, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable in Serbia is perfectly fine for en.Wikipedia. Guideline does not demand that notability be world-wide.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:34, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.