Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marks & Clerk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The Bushranger One ping only 02:02, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Marks & Clerk

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Old but not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:39, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 
 * Keep - A large multinational law firm in existence for over 125 years. Added several refs. More are readily available, so meets WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic (talk) 04:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - a large firm. It has over a dozen offices, has over a hundred attorneys, and is over a hundred years old; this passes my standards. Bearian (talk) 20:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 05:50, 6 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.