Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markus Kaarlonen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (As noted below it does need ALOT of improvements - Anyway I have no objections to this being renominated in November or so if no improvements have been made.) (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  16:25, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Markus Kaarlonen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Biography of a living person, completely lacking sources of any kind. Silverfish8088 (talk) 17:50, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 September 4.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 18:08, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - The subject meets criteria #6 and #10 of WP:MUSICBIO. I have also added several sources in the article. --Λeternus (talk) 18:24, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 September 4.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 19:59, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - Agree with Λeternus, keep for the moment at least. Certainly could be improved significantly. Consider cross references with other occupations.PotassiBot (talk) 21:08, 4 September 2014 (UTC) — PotassiBot (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  and is indef blocked Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:50, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 6 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  22:32, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 11:55, 20 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.