Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markus Osterhaus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 16:38, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Markus Osterhaus

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unremarkable person. The only 'references' are links to  the German  Wikipedia and appear to have nothing  in  common whatsoever with  this entry. The listed combat missions bear  no  connection  to  the subject. The geneology section  is superfluous and irrelevant. Possible hoax. Kudpung (talk) 12:09, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: unverfified and unreferenced BLP. Utterly fails WP:MILPEOPLE, and even if his ancestry could be confirmed, notability is not inherited.  bahamut0013  words deeds 16:01, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete to clarify, the links to the deWP are to the family name, and articles on two deceased distinguished members of the family; none of the  articles  mention him.   DGG ( talk ) 17:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: per Bahamut. AustralianRupert (talk) 01:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - per Bahamut. Anotherclown (talk) 06:08, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom.  Dewritech (talk)  14:21, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:N & WP:SOLDIER; furthermore, in the namesakes section there are individuals who do meet notability, however that in itself not impart notability on the subject (see WP:INHERIT), that is unless it can be verified by reference that he is a pretender to a head of state position. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 14:56, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Please see the website www.osterhaus-ahnen.de. Over 10 years of hard genealogical work. All non-profit and free for anyone, respect. It is his biography a varied life as a soldier (fight against terrorism in the world)and family researchers. I think it deserves respect and recognition. The German entry in the Wikipedia is prepared and followed. Now he turns to the international family tree for every one in the world, also in the US. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Checker ce2005 (talk • contribs) 10:55, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.