Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlene (Japanese singer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Enigmamsg 19:06, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Marlene (Japanese singer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Owing to her single name WP:BEFORE was tricky but I was unable to find any evidence of credibility and article and sources doen't present any obvious evidence of notability. I tagged for A7 and was reverted by an IP so going regular AfD. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 21:30, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

*Delete - The first reference is a copyright violation and I concur with. Barbara ✐ ✉  01:34, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I saw the same COPYVIO report but decided that it wasn't really that owing to most of the text in common being the listing. A better job of paraphrasing should definitely have been done. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:41, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I have at the least taken care of the copyvio issue, and the history can be cleaned up as needed. Dekimasu よ! 08:07, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep and fix. It's hard to source the older Oricon charts online because their site only gives data from post-1988, but I believe she had at least two albums that charted in the top 10 nationally in the early 1980s. If anyone has access to Oricon Album Chart Book: Complete Edition 1970-2005 (ISBN 4-87131-077-9), that would give the Oricon rankings, or maybe someone knows a better way to prove this for AfD purposes. Jazz.co.jp claims that the rankings were #8 for Deja Vu and #5 for Magic with sales over 200K. Anyway, the Oricon site verifies lower charting albums later in her career. Further, Deja Vu was also in the top 50 albums in sales for the year of 1983  and she seems to have hit #1 in the USEN Western music chart in 1986 ("Left Alone" which was the theme song for the 1986 film Cabaret). She is significant enough to have had a greatest hits album released by Sony Japan in 2005 after having an earlier greatest hits released in 1988. The Japanese Wikipedia article is at ja:マリーン. Passes WP:MUSICBIO #2, #3, and #5 at the very least. Dekimasu よ! 07:33, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Some of the scanty English coverage. Manila Bulletin ran a story on her in 2016 that I can't get to render right: Marlene dela Peña: Highest paid Pinay jazz artist in Japan. And a not-too-flattering review from Japan Times in 2007: Marlene meets Masato Honda. Dekimasu よ! 08:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Because there is a delete vote I can't withrdraw and Speedy Keep myself but 's resources prove notability to me (and has access to Japanese language material that I didn't have when doing my own BEFORE). Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 14:41, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep and Speedy Close - It appears that Barkeep49 has withdrawn the nomination. I considered doing a non-admin closure myself but Barkeep is correct that the one Delete vote above has probably muddied the procedural waters. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 20:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep as passes WP:NMUSIC and has rs coverageAtlantic306 (talk) 09:12, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.