Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlene Cullen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:48, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Marlene Cullen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a writer who does not seem to satisfy WP:AUTHOR. Originally created by, so also a likely autobiography. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:46, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see any reliable sources not generated by the author that would pass notability, besides the Patch article.Angryapathy (talk) 20:11, 28 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  18:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  18:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  18:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  18:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  18:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete many order of magnitude below the level of notability. When an article says the subject wrote "local newsletters" that pretty much screams not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:03, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - With only the Patch web news article to back up notability, this article fails WP:GNG. -Indy beetle (talk) 06:03, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * delete Fails GNG. L3X1 (distænt write)  14:29, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. One profile in a local newspaper so minor that we don't even have an article about it is far from enough for WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, but be open to keep if better sourcing found. This writer does not appear to satisfy WP:AUTHOR. She appears to have a solid writing career and have at least some noteworthiness. But better sources need to be found in terms of reliable sourcing. Knox490 (talk) 04:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.