Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlind Nuriu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Speedy close: G5 deletion, added to the SNOW delete below the panda ₯’  10:41, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Marlind Nuriu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Keeps on getting the prod removed by potential sock puppets-and player has not played full yet. Wgolf (talk) 06:03, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 06:06, 11 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - he has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. WP:G5 may also still apply as there is an ongoing SPI into the article's creator. Sir Sputnik (talk) 06:07, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 06:54, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete not played in a WP:FPL. I can't see significant coverage. Fails WP:NFOOTY. Btw and, per WP:PROD you should have directly taken it here instead of tagging prod for a second time.    Jim Carter (from public cyber)  07:20, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * You may want read up on your policies before suggesting that other users have done something wrong. WP:PROD specifically says that it "may still be used on BLPs, including BLPs from which the sticky prod has been legitimately removed." Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:19, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * No no.. you haven't done anything wrong but I can see one inline and another source in the article so per WP:BLPPROD adding Blpprod when the article have sources (doesn't matter if unreliable) is not a good idea. But maybe it is possible that after adding Prod someone has added sources. So, no worries. Thanks for your reply.  Jim Carter (from public cyber)  06:16, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * You're point is well taken, but my basic point still stands as well. Please get your facts straight when offering criticism. When Wgolf tagged the article for BLPPROD, it was unsourced, and the subsequent PROD was completely in line with policy as I've already explained. However well intentioned your comment may be, I resent having to defend a deletion process that was done entirely by the book. Sir Sputnik (talk) 06:49, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:28, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:28, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 15:52, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - He hasn't played in a Fully professional league and he doesn't have any international caps either therefore he fails WP:NFOOTBALL. IJA (talk) 15:57, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.