Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlon Young


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 23:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Marlon Young

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unknown actor with no references nor notable acting roles. I could not find any independent, reliable coverage but, as is, the article fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. BriefEdits (talk) 20:56, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 20:56, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 20:56, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete My WP:BEFORE has shown no coverage in IRS. A bunch of user generated sources only. He fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR - he may have had a few roles but none can be considered significant. Less Unless (talk) 21:09, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 22:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Looks like he's actually been in quite a few shows and movies, but never as a large role. I'm seeing him mentioned as being in a new movie but again it's just a mention of his name. Not able to find anything actually discussing him. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:16, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete the significant role rule is violated. Plus articles need reliable sources, MySpace and IMDb are both not at all reliable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:00, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep since he played a recurring character on Family Matters, which was a hit TV show in its day. However the sourcing is atrocious. Bearian (talk) 18:18, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:12, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Kym Gold: Notability aside, searches do not return wp:reliable sources that can be used to satisfy wp:verifiability, which is part of a core policy. Redirecting to the subject's (former?) spouse (R from spouse) as a WP:ATD-R. ~  Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 17:21, 16 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.