Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marly (Almir Leka)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Marly (Almir Leka)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

in the last 6 months i've been patrolling black hat seo fake news sources, i've never run across an article that used literally every single one as their sources. So obviously, some paid for spam with no reliable sources. Praxidicae (talk) 20:23, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, there are more articles and materials that due to the space and content size could not be included, but given an opportunity to prove that to you I would be glad to link them. All the sources listed are from google news articles and their purpose serves as they are in English, but as I previously mentioned I'd be happy to provide other links that are not from google news, but from Albanian national websites. I'd be grateful if you consider not shutting it down by prejudice over the links and instead asking here directly what kind of other proof you need. I'd be more than willing to provide it immediately. Akelrimla —Preceding undated comment added 20:47, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:26, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:26, 27 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep per above. Cabeyi (talk) 21:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC) User blocked indefinitely as LTA, see log. -- Kinu t/c 07:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources found. Courrecx (talk) 04:14, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per Above. Fabulouers (talk) 05:26, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet WP:GNG. No reliable sources. Clearly an autobiography as it was created by User:Akelrimla (read the username backwards). -- Kinu t/c 07:36, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as there seems to be plenty of sources in many platforms and websites. Plus, many songs published by the author have hundreeds of thousands up to millions of views.actual sources Lakepuppulake — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lakepupulake (talk • contribs) 08:47, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: checkuser has confirmed that Lakepupulake is the same editor as the article creator Akelrimla. -- Kinu t/<i style="color:red">c</i> 18:57, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Nice one; not been blocked though? ——  SN  54129  17:19, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Perhaps the checkuser admin was assuming good faith, but looking at this editor's contributions, they're a self-promoting SPA, so I've gone ahead and blocked. -- <strong style="color:blue">Kinu <i style="color: red">t</i>/<i style="color:red">c</i> 22:34, 29 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and the terms of use;, does the guy above get reported now.  ——  SN  54129  12:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete this spam. Guy (help!) 15:12, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete — subject lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Emphasis on the “reliable sources”. Furthermore nothing makes me happier in this life than “spoiling business” for paid editors. Celestina007 (talk) 22:27, 29 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - subject has links that prove he is charted in Albanian Top Awards, apparently the biggest national event, held by the biggest national television Top Channel. Plus numerous google links that are not only from google news. On the side: there's nothing that makes me happier than proving wrong to wikipedia admins that never dig further than the surface and unfortunately cause damages to many public figures this way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saralala123 (talk • contribs) 08:46, 30 April 2020 (UTC)  — Saralala123 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Yeah? so you should have no problem providing a source for each of those statements. Praxidicae (talk) 10:07, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * No I wouldn't have any problem at all: here you have three articles about Top Awards : 1., 2. , 3.  , and here another bunch of articles:  4.  , 5.  , 6. . There are more but i stopped myself here. Have a nice day everyone and be positive.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saralala123 (talk • contribs) 10:32, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If you think any of those are reliable or establish notability, I've got a bridge to sell you. Praxidicae (talk) 18:50, 30 April 2020 (UTC)


 * You asked me sources about Top Awards charting and I gave them to you accordingly from the website of the official channel that holds that kind of Award Show. (I was even generous providing 3 more articles to a total of 6) On the side: If I had to buy a bridge from you I'd be bringing the triple of the cash, divided in three cases, all filled with authentic money, and you'd still leave two behind fearing they'd be fake... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saralala123 (talk • contribs) 19:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * By that logic the award I won in third grade for spelling makes me notable. "Winning xyz award" doesn't establish notability, but good luck with that bridge, glad you agree that the rest of the sources are trash too. Praxidicae (talk) 21:00, 30 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - no reliable sources. All musicians win some awards, collaborate with other musicians, and get some local coverage, even run of the mill ones. Bearian (talk) 02:01, 2 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.