Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marriott Peterborough


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 20:04, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Marriott Peterborough

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Advertising a private hotel. Poorly written and formatted. Chrisieboy (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete. No asserted notability for this individual member of the Marriott chain. --Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 19:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added some references. The article asserts notability by claiming that this is the only four-star hotel in Peterborough. --Eastmain (talk) 20:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Chetblong T  C 01:38, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to wikitravel. Change to delete per Metro's comments below.Wikipedia is not a hotel directory, no matter how many new beds the hotel has. Travellingcari (talk) 19:14, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keilana | Parlez ici 03:30, 24 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment. Transwikiing to Wikitravel is not really an option. Wikitravel is not licensed under the same copyright license as Wikipedia, and it's organized by city rather than having separate articles about individual hotels. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 09:11, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is no claim to notability in this article.  Do all 4 star hotels receive Wiki articles simply for being 4 star facilities?  No, nor should they.BWH76 (talk) 14:10, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Wait, it introduced new bedding in 2007...no, still not notable. DJ Clayworth (talk) 05:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just another chain hotel with no claim to notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:30, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.