Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mars One (Canada)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 17:44, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Mars One (Canada)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Same rationale as Articles for deletion/Mars One (U.S.): A list of candidates at this early stage of the programme is simply not notable. Mars One is nowhere near ready to fly - if it ever does - and this is not the final list of people who will fly on it just people who have got to the next stage of the application process.  W.  D.   Graham  19:06, 14 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article content is not about any notable people. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, not a self-popularization platform. There are around 75 applicants from Canada selected for Round 2 of Mars One. All of them obviously can not, and should not, be listed in an encyclopedia, just for this achievement. Rounds 3 and 4 are still left. The final 40 or so candidates selected (from all over the world) at the end of Round 4, should be listed. And that information will be available in 2015 or later.--Sarthak Sharma (talk) 19:24, 17 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:52, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:52, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:52, 14 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 06:38, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. A list of people who actually go on the project, if and when it actually happens, would be notable — but a list of candidates at this stage of the process is not notable, especially given the surprisingly large number of people on this list for whom we don't even have a surname. It's also worth noting that the creator seems to have created this and the US sibling as standalone lists only after failing to win a reversion war over having the names listed directly in Mars One itself. Bearcat (talk) 18:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Its a case of WP:TOOSOONUnatnas1986 (talk) 16:54, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.