Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marshall Islands–Turkey relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus due to lack of participation (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:52, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Marshall Islands–Turkey relations

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. There is hardly anything to these relations: no trade, agreements or embassies. The 2 high level visits were part of multilateral forums. The MV Maersk Tigris incident is covered in its own article. And the reading list is excessive and contains no mention of Turkey. LibStar (talk) 00:39, 14 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  01:31, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Turkey,  and Oceania.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:13, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Essentially non-existent relations, a Turkish-language search did not reveal any sources. --GGT (talk) 10:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Although the relationship is obviously slim, it does exist, and information given in this article is useful to the readers and sourced. The mention of the honorary consulate in Istanbul and the presidential visits cannot be placed in another better article. The mention of the MV Maersk Tigris incident is relevant to the relationship (and therefore to the article), while pointing to further details at that article. The only thing that needs to be purged in this article is the long useless and unspecific further reading list. Place Clichy (talk) 09:32, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Yilloslime (talk) 14:19, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Relisting to evaluate article improvements Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:00, 29 March 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Last week Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk &#124; contribs) 03:35, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. I just improved the article, including mutual agreements and other stuff. No reason to delete anymore. Randam (talk) 05:30, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.