Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marta Cunningham (director) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:04, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Marta Cunningham (director)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR and WP:CREATIVE; Of the 10 sources cited: 5 are Imdb (self published) 3 are published by Glamour about a film they made with her (so not independent) 1 is from Sundance institute announcing that she was chosen to follow one of their programs (not independent and not in-depth just a resume) and 1 is a list of nominees for a prize the she didn't win. The article creator is Sugarskypic which is the name of her production company. Clearly a promotional puff piece. Domdeparis (talk) 08:33, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:11, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:11, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:12, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment new links have been added but they refer to her first documentary that was nominated for a number of awards notably 2 Emmys but won none of them. None of the links talk about the subject but rather the documentary. None of the sources are independent in-depth coverage of the subject and this article now reads even more like a resume than before. This does not help her to pass WP:CREATIVE I maintain my nomination fro deletion. Domdeparis (talk) 11:21, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:47, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete scanning the sources and my search, there are nominations for prizes and writing credits, not no major prizes won, the credits are for episodes in series except for one minor documentary film. Moreover, there do not seem to be any profiles or feature articles about her.  Looks like it's just WP:TOOSOON.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:35, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * delete per above. WP:Gale search found references to one of er moview, but not to her per se.Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:02, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * and you have left comments on a draft article for this same subject saying that it is notable. I thought you might like to contribute to this afd discussion as it seems to be going the other way. Domdeparis (talk) 16:28, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting to give pinged users a chance to comment.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13(talk) 18:13, 10 May 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak keep because I think there are sufficient sources. Not sure what disqualifies the Glamour ones since it is an independent editorial outlet writing about not itself? Amisom (talk) 14:28, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The glamour sources are talking about a film they commissioned to be made by her so it is an affiliated source. Domdeparis (talk) 14:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.