Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martha Cole


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep (NAC), per WP:SK as nominator withdrew. Ajraddatz (talk) 22:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Martha Cole

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable, fails WP:ARTIST Iago Qnsi  (talk) 17:28, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: This article was created as a part of this meetup: Meetup/Regina/ArtAndFeminism 2016/University of Regina. The meetup seems to have produced a lot of articles of questionable quality/notability -- nearly all of them either have been deleted or have ongoing AfDs. - Iago Qnsi (talk) 17:28, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  18:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  18:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:38, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:39, 11 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Based on the sources appears to be a well-established artist. Gamaliel  ( talk ) 15:33, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Clear keep simple google search finds significant coverage in substantial non-local sources, Sadads (talk) 17:10, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: Six of the ongoing AfDs referred to in the nomination: Articles for deletion/Amber Dalton, Articles for deletion/Martha Cole, Articles for deletion/Marilyn Levine, Articles for deletion/Marsha Kennedy, Articles for deletion/Marilyn Levine and Articles for deletion/Iris Hauser have been initiated by . The event where an article was created is not in itself a valid criterion for deletion. That articles should be deleted because related articles have been also been nominated for deletion is also not a valid criterion;  The AfD procedure for deleting multiple pages does not apply here, and should not be used as an argument. Mduvekot (talk) 17:13, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: I apologize, this AfD was a mistake -- I clearly misunderstood the criteria for artist notability. I move to keep and speedy close this discussion. - Iago Qnsi (talk) 17:36, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep:. Quite a lot of sources out there. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 19:41, 12 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.