Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martha Lipton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Jenks24 (talk) 15:16, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Martha Lipton

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

microstub article with no assertion of notability, not even a full sentence Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 07:18, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * keep. She was a prima in New York City which means there's a lot of press coverage . East of Borschov 07:43, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a very outdated approach to article writing, but Lipton really does have an ANB entry, and that alone should be enough. The entry also provides several sources for further reading. Zagal e jo^^^ 08:31, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Plenty of coverage means it's expandable, which means it's a cleanup issue and not a deletion issue. Redfarmer (talk) 10:41, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I expanded the article a little with a couple of refs. She's clearly notable enough, the article has been flagged for rescue as I'm not really that hot on opera singers, I'm confident more can be added. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 11:54, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for rescue by the Article Rescue Squadron.  Snotty Wong   confer 14:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Remember, it only takes two seconds or less to do a Google news archive search. Do that BEFORE you nominate something for deletion.  Being short, is never a reason to delete an article, and also its only one day old.    D r e a m Focus  02:15, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep -meets guidelines and has plenty of available sources.♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:57, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:07, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, especially in its present well-referenced and expanded form, but even in its micro-stub form. Note that this page was linked at Wikipedia:Music encyclopedia topics. Always worth checking for that (and "what links here" in general) before putting a biography up for deletion. Martha Lipton also has 10 incoming article links. I also echo Dream Focus's remarks about nominating an article for deletion 7 hours after its creation without even doing a minimal check for sources. Voceditenore (talk) 06:36, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per all above and WP:SNOW.4meter4 (talk) 08:06, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.