Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martha O'Kennon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  00:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Martha O'Kennon

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Retired professor with single-digit number of publications, one with 24 citations on Google Scholar and all the rest less than 10, far from enough for WP:PROF. All sources are by her or from her employer, inadequate for WP:GNG. This was already draftified and restored to article space (by copy & paste) without any significant improvement; for draft history see. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Mathematics, Computing, China, Michigan, New York,  and Virginia.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  08:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Record looks far short of WP:NPROF, and no other notability is apparent. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 09:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. She also does not meet WP:BASIC. I found one news article talking about art pieces she makes, and nothing more. DaffodilOcean (talk) 10:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Search turned up nothing to meet notability on any standard. Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing came up in a search that would indicate any sort of notability. Also of note, the article creator appears to be a WP:SPA dedicated to writing articles on Albion College related people and topics, including a number that may or may not meet notability standards. nf utvol (talk) 15:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment that, looking through images contributed by, all the images appear to be tagged as "own work".  That appears to be true for very few of them (in particular, not for the ones that are 80 years old).  Anyone know how to report at Commons? Russ Woodroofe (talk) 20:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I noticed that myself. I have gone in and tagged the items that are not clearly in the public domain for removal on the basis that this user is not the owner of the works. nf utvol (talk) 01:26, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. She seems to have led a neat life, but not one that rises quite to the level of encyclopedic notability. BD2412  T 16:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete, as per the arguments above. -Samoht27 (talk) 17:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. The citability data is quite low, and there is nothing else to indicate passing WP:PROF on other grounds. Nsk92 (talk) 17:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete since subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC by a cricket yard. -The Gnome (talk) 13:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.