Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martha Rogers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. --Tikiwont 10:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Martha Rogers and Don Peppers

 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Nom - non-notable academic biography. Only claim to notability is a non-notable set of business texts. Rklawton 20:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.   —David Eppstein 05:58, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom --Crusio 08:18, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete both as per WP:BIO and lack of references. Stifle (talk) 11:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Adjunct professors (even that only applies to M.R.) are not usually notable academics in the absence of serious academic publications, and there s no evidence the popular ones here are particularly notable. DGG (talk) 01:08, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above.  Cheers, :) Dloh cierekim   19:51, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete There is little indication of notability in these academic biographies. --Stormbay 03:25, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.