Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martha W. Alibali


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Non-admin closure. -- Boricua  e  ddie  00:50, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Martha W. Alibali

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

University of Wisconsin professor. Fails WP:PROF. Eliz81(talk)(contribs) 19:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Satisfies WP:PROF by exceeding the "average college instructor/professor" on the basis of numerous publications in major refereed journals, publishing a scholarly book through Prentice Hall, receiving a research recognition award from the American Psychological Association, and being a tenured professor at a major university. Edison 19:23, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.   —David Eppstein 19:25, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The APA Fellow award is the most significant-looking accomplishment listed in the article, but from a web search I found that they elect 150 fellows annually, large enough that I don't think we can rely on it alone for notability. However, I also found a mainstream media article on her research (Milwaukee Journal-Sentinal, Oct 22, 2005, also reprinted a month later in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram) and a related article in Science News (Jan 15, 2005). And she has several highly cited papers in Google scholar. That's enough, I think. —David Eppstein 19:34, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Full professor at major university, book from reputable publisher, minor award (Robert L. Fantz Memorial), and several reasonably highly cited papers. Espresso Addict 23:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per above, contra nom. Bearian 23:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.