Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marthe De Pillecyn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to K3 (band). Philg88 ♦talk 06:51, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Marthe De Pillecyn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The common outcomes (listed on WP:MusicOutcomes WP:MUSICOUTCOMES) states that band members, unless they're spectacular in achievements) do not deserve their own article. This may not even pass WP:GNG. // Posted by larsona ( Talk ) // 22:21, 15 November 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I don't see enough coverage for there to be an article for K3, the referenced group. If the group is not notable, I don't think a member is either. Tangledupinbleu chs (talk) 04:46, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - I cannot see any sane reason to have all the band members on their own articles. Too little to merge into the main article, so lets just delete it. Ceosad (talk) 21:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:35, 25 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Clearly not independently notable and I found no better coverage. SwisterTwister   talk  05:06, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to K3 (band). This seems the obvious outcome here. --Michig (talk) 20:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.