Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martial Adept Class (Dungeons & Dragons)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. —Doug Bell talk 07:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Martial Adept Class (Dungeons & Dragons)
I am nominating this article for deletion on Notability grounds. Also, all of its text is duplicated on its parent page, Tome of Battle: Book of Nine Swords, so it is completely superfluous. Iceberg3k 14:07, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability aside, it is redundant. Edward Wakelin 16:40, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nom. Wikipedia is not a Dungeons & Dragons Player's Handbook, Dungeon Master's Guide or the Monster Manual. --tgheretford (talk) 17:25, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Perfectly happy to lose this.  There is a slow rewrite process underway for D&D articles to cut down on cruft and copyvio and make better articles that are sources and meet WP:FICTION (and so forth, as appropriate).  This does not fit in the proposed article structure, and is largely redundant besides.  What of this needs said, is said elsewhere.  Serpent&#39;s Choice 06:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No need for duplication. Quack 688 08:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.