Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martial Anthropology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 11:51, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Martial Anthropology

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Violates WP:OR and is spam. Drawn Some (talk) 02:42, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Nakon  02:44, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge. Reduce it to one line that explains it exists and merge it into List_of_martial_arts. -moritheil Talk 03:41, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete or find an appropriate rd target (e.g., Hoplology?) JJL (talk) 03:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  —JJL (talk) 03:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Martial Anthropology is not another Martial Art for the list. Martial Anthropology is the essence, origin and study of "all" Martial Art; the reason behind its beginning, progress, development, and continuation, and the future of Martial Art, which is now accurately referred to as, Martial Art Science. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zensei (talk • contribs) 04:23, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Which, I note, has already been deleted for lack of notability. If you could just find some references from the press or media that talk about why this is significant and different from other martial arts, it would not be facing deletion. -moritheil Talk 05:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete while there is a valid subject of Anthropology applied to the Martial Arts (a book on the subject) this article does not address it well, appearing more as a advert for one particular institute with a broken website http://www.martialanthropologyinstitute.com/.--Salix (talk): 06:25, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The deleted article Martial Art Science told is that it is User:Zensei's own novel invention. The above statement tells us that this article is the same.  This is original research, the documentation of a heretofore undocumented idea that has failed to escape its creator and has yet to go through a process of fact checking, peer review, publication, ackowledgement, and acceptance into the general corpus of human knowledge.  Such is forbidden. Delete. Uncle G (talk) 11:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete not currently a topic that can support an article, may (one day) be spun out of the main Martial arts page but I'd wait of a natural emergence there. --Nate1481 11:55, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.