Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Brisby


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to The Secret of NIMH.  Ryan Postlethwaite See the mess I've created or let's have banter 04:24, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Martin Brisby

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable fictional character. Long term unsourced article and I can't find any sources. Hut 8.5 10:31, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete perhaps redirect to The Secret of NIMH, but honestly there's nothing worth merging here. Just a lot of fancruft. JuJube (talk) 17:07, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Almost entirely plot summary. No references on the article now, and my google search for reliable sources came up completely dry. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 04:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as WP:ITSCRUFT is never a valid reason for deletion, nor is WP:JNN. -- Happy editing!  Sincerely,  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 22:06, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I said why it isn't notable - the article doesn't cite any sources, hasn't for a long time, and nobody here could find any. Essays do not override concerns rooted in policies and guidelines. Do you know of any sources? Hut 8.5 08:47, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Just a quick glance at this seemed like there's potential. -- Happy editing!  Sincerely,  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 18:10, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Fansites and other unreliable sources giving trivial mentions. If you refine the search there's actually only 79 unique hits, and that includes Wikipedia and pages talking about unrelated subjects. Hut 8.5 18:21, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete and redirect to The Secret of NIMH. Lacks sources, assertion/evidence of notability. (And, shit, I just Friday night taped over my childhood, original broadcast copy of the movie.) --EEMIV (talk) 19:42, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.