Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Deller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to FM (Canadian band). j⚛e deckertalk 05:40, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Martin Deller

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Just one line and a link to a website (granted it is official at least) Though from the looks of it, this should either be userfied or a redirect to that band. Wgolf (talk) 05:58, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 06:25, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 06:25, 28 August 2014 (UTC)


 * WP:NMUSIC does not grant every individual member of a notable band an automatic right to keep their own separate standalone BLP; rather, it specifies that if their notability is purely band-dependent, and you cannot adequately source that they've done notable things independently of the band (e.g. producing other notable artists, releasing solo albums, etc.), then they should just get a redirect to the band. So no prejudice against future recreation if somebody can write and source a more substantial article than this, making a more substantive notability claim than just his membership in the band, but as things currently stand this should be redirected to FM (Canadian band). Bearcat (talk) 17:16, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  15:22, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:05, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I agree with the opinions above. A stand-alone article is not justified. Do as they say. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 08:11, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the band. Nothing here to justify keeping a standalone article. --Michig (talk) 07:19, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.