Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Eastwood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  17:31, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Martin Eastwood

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject has appeared on some reality TV shows but other than that there is nothing to indicate notability. Numerous low-quality sources mention his attempt to get 100,000 instagram followers but that is obviously not going to confer notability. SmartSE (talk) 12:33, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:09, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:09, 8 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Subject doesn't meet WP:GNG. (There are limited sources available, and those that are available do not seem to cover the subject in particular depth or as a primary topic. The source used to support the subject's First Dates appearance, for example, is a less than substantive discussion on "bantz" about Trócaire boxes). Subject also doesn't meet WP:ENT. (Minor appearances in two reality shows doesn't meet the expectation of having had "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions"). Subject also doesn't meet WP:NMUSIC or related guidelines. (An association to a record label, regardless of its output or chart success, does not confer notability. Even if the latter were cited. Which it is not. Being a "co-manager" of any business [regardless of its success or notability] does not confer notability on any subject.) The COI, PAID, PROMO and other issues are also concerning. In short: a firm delete. Guliolopez (talk) 14:07, 8 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.