Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Edobor (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 16:01, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Martin Edobor
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm nominating this on behalf of an IP editor. Their rationale is:

It does not pass notability test. It was deleted earlier in 2017 and is back

Reyk YO! 08:24, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:21, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:21, 14 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Being chair of a political party's youth committee is not an automatic inclusion freebie under WP:NPOL — but this article makes no claim that he has additional notability for other reasons, and is not referenced well enough to get him over WP:GNG in lieu of having to pass NPOL: it's referenced entirely to primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other things, with virtually no evidence of any reliable source coverage about him. Bearcat (talk) 15:07, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * He isnt chair of a political party's youth committee. The Fabians are an independent organisation and very notable in their own right. Rathfelder (talk) 15:57, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Leaving aside the fact that the Fabian Society's article explicitly describes it as an affiliate of the Labour Party, even if that's inaccurate it still wouldn't change a darn thing. Even chairs of independent organizations still don't get a notability freebie just for existing, in the absence of any evidence that they clear WP:GNG on the sourcing. Bearcat (talk) 19:18, 14 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable activist. There is not enough sourcing to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:46, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per and, as well as WP:MILL, and WP:TOOSOON. There's nothing he's done that has been beyond the ordinary political activist. We tend to hold off on creating articles on young activists. Bearian (talk) 17:59, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG and NPOL. GPL93 (talk) 16:08, 20 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.