Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Faulks (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Toddst1 (talk) 01:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Martin Faulks
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Recreated formerly deleted article (which was never tagged as such, but has perhaps been sufficiently rewritten to not qualify as CSD). Contested prod, but still NN. The content of the article and the type of detail before I cleaned it up points to COI by either Faulks or someone he knows (there are quite a few redlink contributors involved in this article, and things that no one person would know unless they were involved directly in all those events). There are no independent sources supporting his notability. Top hits: his Myspace, this article, a forum, a blog, and LinkedIn. That spread is not what I would expect of a sufficiently notable individual. MSJapan (talk) 01:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, seems to be non-notable judging by the article and Google.  ~EdGl  02:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as non-notable person (not to mention recreation of deleted material). Terraxos (talk) 03:35, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom Fattyjwoods  ( Push my button  ) 03:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Reposted deleted material--Alchemy12 (talk) 11:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.