Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Guevara Urbina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. :) · Salvidrim!  ·  &#9993;  12:02, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Martin Guevara Urbina

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not quite sure what to make of this article. The current content is simply WP:SOAP and WP:RESUME. Basically all content came from User:Sofia alvarez1 and User:Murbina, both appearing to be single-purpose accounts, the latter likely being the subject himself. The subject itself might be borderline notable per WP:ACADEMIC as from the current article content, but note that WP:GOOGLETEST (in particular Google News) give basically no credible results. bender235 (talk) 14:04, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. – →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  14:18, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Delete - It doesn't seem to meet WP:ACADEMIC. All the references in the article are primary and I can't find any reliable secondary sources for it to meet WP:GNG.Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 30 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 05:19, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone  17:21, 7 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. He appears to be a prolific writer, but that's not one of the WP:PROF criteria and I can't find sufficient evidence that he's making an impact. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:17, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete He does not meet WP:ACADEMIC, as noted by David Eppstein above Kabirat (talk) 08:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.