Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Iveson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 07:53, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Martin Iveson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable person. Claim of notability lacks reliable sources. - The   Magnificentist  15:42, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:09, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:09, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * keep music artists for multiple notable video games + jazz career. article could use more sources added, so. Shaddim (talk) 10:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Seems to have a credible and respected career in the industry but lacks the significant, independent, third party sources necessary to qualify for encyclopedic importance. If an editor provided better significant sources I could be persuaded to change my vote; my searches under both “Martin Iveson” and “atjazz” only turned up the usual kinds of things one would expect to confirm existence. ShelbyMarion (talk) 13:39, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947  00:22, 16 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete run of the mill music creator with no indepth, reliable 3rd party source coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:47, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Reach Out to the Truth 18:44, 1 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.