Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Randall Travel (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:38, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Martin Randall Travel
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Nothing notable here. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:42, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 12:37, 20 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Per these sources, topic is meeting WP:GNG:
 * The Age article. This article constitutes significant coverage.
 * Daily Mail article. An eight-paragraph article (be sure to scroll down and read the passages in-between the article links in the article), entirely about Martin Randall Travel.
 * This article may also be functional:
 * Travel Trade Gazette UK & Ireland article. . Appears to be about Martin Randall Travel, but I don't have access to the entire article.
 * — Northamerica1000 (talk) 01:48, 21 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per my comments at Articles for deletion/Martin Randall Travel (2nd nomination). The substantial coverage in multiple independent reliable sources establishes that Martin Randall Travel passes Notability. The nomination fails to explain why the previous discussion's result was invalid. Cunard (talk) 23:51, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment The previous discussion was in 2008. The coverage is an interview with the founder and one short news item. Overall, this is not significant coverage. Philafrenzy (talk) 00:11, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The full text of my comment from 2008: "*Keep Appears to be a somewhat notable company. Using a Google News Archive search, I've found several articles that are about this company, Times Online, The Age, Travel Trade Gazette UK & Ireland, Telegraph, The San Francisco Chronicle, and The Mail on Sunday. This company has also received significant coverage in a history book, titled A History of Western Architecture. Even if the AITO Travel Company of the Year Award is non-notable, Martin Randall Travel has received some coverage for this award. The significant coverage of this travel company indicates that it is notable and passes WP:COMPANY. Cunard (talk) 23:23, 25 November 2008 (UTC)" The Times Online link is now under a paywall and the Google Books link is no longer working, but at the time, I found significant coverage about Martin Randall Travel in the book "A History of Western Architecture". Cunard (talk) 01:35, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.