Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Robertson (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep per WP:SNOW. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Martin Robertson
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Was prodded by an IP with the rationale "Barring one measly 20 year citation, the extent of the rather bare webpage in question stands, unsourced, hence why I opt for deletion vis-à-vis the nomination process." However, it was previously prodded so I'm procedurally moving this to AFD Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:29, 23 May 2022 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:29, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * KEEP. I'm none the wiser as to what the motivation for this is. Lack of references surely can't be reason enough?Twospoonfuls (εἰπέ) 02:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Poetry.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 05:30, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. There's an ODNB entry, which meets ANYBIO on its own, also a 17-page obituary from the British Academy, an obituary in The Independent national newspaper, and several more I can't be bothered to check -- this is a complete waste of everyone's time. Espresso Addict (talk) 06:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)