Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Roth (DJ)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:16, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Martin Roth (DJ)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

BLP with no RS. Fails GNG. Widefox ; talk 09:33, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless someone is willing to work on that article. I'm not. Peter238 (talk) 12:52, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * (creator). Why create all these articles then? Especially BLPs? You could have CSD or PRODDed them all. Widefox ; talk 13:30, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I can't see how that question is relevant. I created them a year ago, not a few days ago. At that time, I thought they were good enough. Peter238 (talk) 13:46, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:BURDEN. Agree WP:V is important, especially BLPs? Widefox ; talk 17:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Again, I can't see how this is relevant, especially linking to WP:BURDEN when I told you multiple times that I won't (and why I won't) edit that article anymore, and voted for deleting it. You really seem to have issues with sounding patronizing and reading comprehension, and I've had enough of this. Goodbye. Peter238 (talk) 18:13, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: changed to procedural close as delete WP:CSD Author requests deletion (and is the only substantial editor). Widefox ; talk 19:56, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Too long. I'll abstain as to keep or delete, but the discography should be trimmed. Discogs can always be in the external links, they don't need to be in the article. Roches (talk) 21:04, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:04, 4 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.