Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Stapleton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Martin Stapleton

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. Most coverage I found was routine sporting reports.  ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 08:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:56, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Boxing, Martial arts,  and England.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:42, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Databases, fight results, and interviews do not constitute the significant independent coverage required to meet WP:GNG. As an MMA fighter he did have three top tier fights, but he lost them all.  His highest ever ranking was #138.  Meeting WP:NMMA carries a presumption of notability, but that is secondary to the lack of coverage. Papaursa (talk) 13:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.