Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Wishnatsky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 23:08, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Martin Wishnatsky

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This subject fails WP:GNG. The subject has no notability other than being the lawyer of a famous person - and notability isn't inherited. Additionally, the sources listed are actually only two sources, as one is triplicated. Kbabej (talk) 16:45, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 16:48, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 16:48, 6 January 2018 (UTC)


 * I disagree. As the subject of Kayla Moore’s remarks, he is tangentially related to Moore’s loss in the recent election. And as far as sources go, there are others out there, I just thought the information irrelevant but others might use them to discuss his anti abortion activities. I am sure there will be more to be said about him in the near future.Postcard Cathy (talk) 16:52, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello @Postcard Cathy! Am I to assume you are voting keep then? In that case, you would want to add "Keep" in bold with a bullet point before your above statement. The format for voting keep or delete, etc, looks like this. Cheers! --Kbabej (talk) 17:03, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominated, I was able to find a few news sources from such as CNN, New York News Daily, The Washington Post, all except the last, mention him breifly. Only the Washington Post has anything in-depth about him. I would prefer to see more in-depth news sources about him. I would also it would fail WP:BIO due to the fact none of them really cover him in depth besides Washington Post. Even though he has been mentioned in multiple news sources does not make him notable, seeing as how any information from the news articles are pretty much interviews on his beliefs, and a little about him. I also was looking at the Washington Post article, here, certain parts of the Biography section look like they came from the Washington Post article pretty much, but not a direct copvio. Since he was involved in abortion protests that might fail WP:BIO1E since one events are generally not notable within themselves. As to per the loss of the election I wasn't really able to find anything about that. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 17:07, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment if anything merge into the article about Roy Moores sexual allegations if anything.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Clarkcj12 (talk) 17:10, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * That sounds like a reasonable solution. Postcard Cathy (talk) 02:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete- fails WP:BLP as notable for one event only.--Rusf10 (talk) 17:26, 6 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.