Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martina Hoffmann


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:37, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Martina Hoffmann

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Sourced almost entirely to primary sources, seems to fail WP:ARTIST and WP:GNG unless my WP:BEFORE is missing something. Waggie (talk) 02:43, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:23, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:23, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:45, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - sources are affiliated and/or personal sites with no truely independent coverage of her work. I'd expect atleast some coverage in independent art magazines, expert websites or newspapers for a short biographical article. A Google search revealed no possible additional sources (aside from a few passing mentions and a lot of false positives with different "Martina Hoffmann"s). The article fails to mention any significant works, that may have received wider attention, or any other evidence for encyclopedic notability - the vague claim about her being "a central figure for contemporary visionary art" is insufficiently sourced. GermanJoe (talk) 07:31, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note - a similar draft version still exists at Draft:Martina Hoffmann, if the article creator wants to continue work, and submit a new draft with more independent sources for AfC review later. GermanJoe (talk) 07:31, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist talk&#124; contribs  09:43, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject lacks notability and reliable independent secondary sources. - GretLomborg (talk) 03:41, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.