Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martina Steckholzer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SKCRIT #1. As shown below, the nominator has withdrawn their nomination and all of the participants have !voted to keep. (non-admin closure) SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 16:51, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Martina Steckholzer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails GNG and unsourced BLP THE NEW  Immortal  Wizard  (chat) 09:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:29, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep, meets WP:ARTIST, works held by a number of museums/galleries (Saatchi Gallery, Museion, Österreichische Galerie Belvedere), article shows this. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:03, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Big waste of time. Nominator should read WP:ARTIST, especially where it says that being in several permanent collections makes someone notable. The article is only about three or four sentences, one of which talks about her inclusion in permanent collections.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:ARTIST 4(d). this is going to become a snowball, you might consider withdrawing, to save the time of the other editors from piling on.--Theredproject (talk) 01:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Withdrawal by nominator per comments above. THE NEW  Immortal  Wizard  (chat) 16:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.