Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marty Young


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. -- Longhair\talk 10:09, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Marty Young

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Marty Young is one of seven articles (now listed at AfD) created by a new user. These articles seem designed to advance the publisher, Brimstone Press. I have listed them separately so that they may be considered separately. Marty Young has not received enough coverage in reliable sources that are independent of Marty Young and Brimstone Press to develop an attributable article on the topic and the article should be deleted. --  Jreferee  (Talk) 01:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of verifiable sources. Capitalistroadster 03:43, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 03:43, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 03:43, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. I created this and the other entries mentioned in the AfD banner. For a full explanation, see my note on Shane Jiraiya Cummings AfD talk page and my talk page. Re: this entry, Young has been nominated for a notable Australian literary award. At least one verifiable source is cited in this entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Outcast44 (talk • contribs) 15:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * 1) Delete Per nom. Lack of reliable sources, does not seem to have notability through a google query. Perfect Proposal  Speak out loud! 00:59, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Devil's advocate. Being "nominated for a Ditmar Award" and being "a judge for the 2004 and 2005 Aurealis Awards" is worth something. Had he won a Ditmar or Aurealis award, I would think that was sufficient. As a marginal case, I would encourage expansion and finding more references. Bondegezou 16:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Delete Per Nom. Twenty Years 08:31, 24 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.