Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martyn J. Fogg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 02:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Martyn J. Fogg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As per Notability and Verifiability. Subject of the article does not meet notability guidelines and all sources are primary. Voyaging talk 15:23, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  15:53, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:38, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:38, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 16:56, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 18:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete typical published works for a Ph.D candidate which the article states he is. Fails WP:PROF. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:07, 14 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep highly notable in his field. --Davidcpearce (talk) 19:23, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Do you have have any independent sources to support that claim? Papaursa (talk) 03:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete There is no significant independent coverage of this individual and all of the article's sources seem to be primary. Papaursa (talk) 03:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.