Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marullus (prefect of Judea)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Nominator is advised to spend some time looking for sources before nominating an article for an AFD discussion to avoid these kinds of closures. Liz Read! Talk! 19:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Marullus (prefect of Judea)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Has only one source. Not close to meeting WP:GNG Serrwinner (talk) 13:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 18.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 13:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, History, Israel,  and Palestine. Skynxnex (talk) 13:57, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep - One of a series of notable Romans being nominated for deletion by this edtor. See my comments at Articles for deletion/Gessius Florus. Undoubtedly notable. AfD is not for article cleanup. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 14:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Automatically notable as a senior government official. People will use this series of nominations as evidence that AFD is broken and that some people are more interested in deleting articles created by others than in building an encyclopedia. I urge the nominator to withdraw these AfDs. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 15:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I agree with you AfD is broken. But I don't think I should be the example here. I was more than enthusiastic to build an encyclopedia here, but that was soon crushed by the same reasons you are stating here. I was simply trying to maintain consistency to some of the ludicrous deletions of people who I viewed as notable but admins just want WP:GNG met. Heck many articles I created got deleted without the people caring. But trust me I'm not doing this in any bad faith. Serrwinner (talk) 15:32, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Improper nomination. TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 22:32, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep for the reasons already stated by Sirfurboy and Eastmain. P Aculeius (talk) 23:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Obviously notable. popo dameron  ⁠ talk  00:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clearly notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.